Document Details |
|
| Name of Department/Committee : | LITD 19 |
|---|---|
| Document Number : | LITD 19 ( 23080) |
| Document Title [English] : | Code of Practice for Designing Online Course Contents and Quality Assessment of Course Content Delivery Platform Part 2: Online Course Contents Quality Model and Assessment Methodology |
| Document Title [Hindi] : | ऑनलाइन पाठ्यक्रम अंतर्वस्तु को डिजाइन करने और पाठ्यक्रम अंतर्वस्तु एवं वितरण प्लेटफ़ॉर्म की गुणता मूल्यांकन हेतु रीति संहिता भाग 2 : ऑनलाइन पाठ्यक्रम अंतर्वस्तु गुणवत्ता मॉडल और मूल्यांकन पद्धति |
| Document Type : | New |
| Language : | English |
| Priority : | 3 |
| ICS Code : | 35.240.90 |
| Date of Project Approval : | 23-06-2023 |
| Standards to be Superseded : | |
Classification Details |
|
| Group : | Software and systems |
| Sub Group : | Information and communication technology |
| Sub Sub Group : | E-Learning |
| Aspects : | Code of Practice |
| Risk : | None |
| Certification : | None |
| Short Commom Man's Title : | |
| ITCHS Code : | |
| Ministry : |
|
| Sustainable development Goals : |
|
| Degree of Equivalence : | Indigenous |
| Identical/Equivalent Standards : | |
| Organization Type: | |
| Sl.No. | Synosis Points | |
| 1 | Different dimensions mentioned in the online course contents quality assessment criterion are based on the factors that are considered to be important from a particular stakeholder perspective. For example, a novice considers factors like publisher/author’s reputation, table of contents, whether the material contains any illustrations and/or solved problems, vocabulary (ease of reading) etc., which influence his/her selection about course material. A quick glance on known topic will give better understanding of quality of content. However, the factors in determining content quality from subject matter expert perspective would be different from that of a novice user. Information coverage, relevance to the objectives of the topic and the content accuracy are the most important aspects of consideration from subject matter expert’s perception. | |
| 2 | At the same time it is also important to look at the standards or best practices which are most relevant to the digital technologies using which the course contents are being developed. Clause 5.0 (Part 1) of this specification, in content development approach, recommended the technologies to be used for content development. | |
Timeline Details |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Stages |
|||||
| Sl. No. |
Stage | Date of Occurence | Remarks | Circulated to | Files |
| 1 | Generation of Document Number | 23-06-2023 | ------- | ||
| 2 | P-Draft | 26-07-2023 | Covering letter generated | ------- | |
| 3 | P-Draft | 26-07-2023 | Duration : 30 Days Remarks : Members are requested to provide the comments - inputs on the draft before 25 August 2023 for further discussions |
LITD 19, LITD 19, LITD 19 : P1, LITD 19 : P2, LITD 19 : P3, | ------- |
| 4 | Skipped to W-Draft | 11-12-2023 | Stage-Changed | ------- | |
| 5 | WC Draft | 11-12-2023 | Duration : 60 Days Submitted for HOD approval Remarks : The committee in its 13th meeting decided to issue wide circulation for the period of 2 months |
------- | |
| 6 | WC Draft | 12-12-2023 | WC approved by HOD |
LITDC LITD 19, LITD 19 : P1, LITD 19 : P3, LITD 19 : P2, | ------- |
| 7 | WC Draft | 31-07-2024 | Duration : 30 Days Submitted for HOD approval Remarks : Two minor modifications done to the previous WC draft based on comments received The committee proposed a 1-month Wide circulation for the modified draft modifications highlighted in yellow |
------- | |
| 8 | WC Draft | 31-07-2024 | WC approved by HOD |
LITDC LITD 19, LITD 19 : P1, LITD 19 : P3, LITD 19 : P2, | ------- |